Trellison InstituteResearch Integrity · Methodology Evaluation

Engineering CDR — CCS & Direct Air Capture

Engineered removal pathways demand a different evidentiary substrate than nature-based approaches. These researchers lead the material science, thermodynamic modeling, and policy frameworks for CCS and Direct Air Capture — the categories where proof-pack chain-of-custody is easiest to audit and hardest to fake.

Why this axis matters

Engineered removal pathways demand a different evidentiary substrate than nature-based approaches. These researchers lead the material science, thermodynamic modeling, and policy frameworks for CCS and Direct Air Capture — the categories where proof-pack chain-of-custody is easiest to audit and hardest to fake.

Researchers tracked — Engineering CDR — CCS & Direct Air Capture

Tier 2Engineering CDR
Dr. Julio Friedmann
Carbon Direct (Chief Scientist)
Most cited voice in industrial decarbonization and CO2 utilization. Carbon Direct already audits CDR — they are the closest existing competitor to what LedgerWell does, or the best partner.
Full profile →
Tier 2Engineering CDR
Howard Herzog
MIT Energy Initiative
Coordinating lead author of IPCC Special Report on CCS. The institutional memory of the field.
Full profile →
Tier 2Engineering CDR
Dr. Christopher Jones
Georgia Tech
DAC materials science leader. Collaborated with Global Thermostat.
Full profile →
Tier 2Engineering CDR
Dr. Klaus Lackner
Arizona State University — Center for Negative Carbon Emissions
Coined DAC in 1999. Mechanical Trees IP. Elder statesman.
Full profile →
Tier 2Engineering CDR
Dr. Jennifer Wilcox
US DOE FECM (Principal Deputy Asst Secretary)
Wrote the first carbon-capture textbook (2012). Runs the federal purse for DAC/CCS. Her shift from U Penn/WRI to DOE means she's the policy decision point.
Full profile →

← Back to carbon capture portfolio

Public comments

Feedback from visitors, translated into business terminology and listed below. Use the assistant in the corner to add a comment.