Senior Scientist — Woodwell Climate Research Center
Senior Scientist at the Woodwell Climate Research Center. Author of the 2022 Science paper calling for regional consistency in agricultural soil-carbon crediting. His 'empty promises' critique of current soil-carbon protocols is the single most cited empirical basis for proof-pack development.
Trellison / LedgerWell intersection. Direct alignment with proof-pack value. High match.
| Their methodology / role | Proof-pack / Trellison fit |
|---|---|
| Empirical-first methodology | Proof pack centres measurement, not model assumption |
| Regional consistency requirement | Proof-pack schema enforces region-appropriate calibration |
| Woodwell institutional strength | Joint Woodwell / Trellison output opens additional funding pathways |
Joint paper operationalising Sanderman's empirical critique as proof-pack rules.
Regional soil-carbon proof-pack pilot on multiple soil orders.
Co-hosted workshop with Woodwell and Colorado State.
Subject: A multi-scale MRV composition engine for your work Dear Jonathan Sanderman, Your multi-method MRV framework for nature-based carbon removal has been a design reference for a per-tonne open-data verification instrument that Trellison Institute has been building. We call the artefact a proof pack. I would welcome a 30-minute conversation to show you the current alpha. We are not asking for endorsement; we are asking for methodology critique and, if useful, an offer of alpha access for your active work. Independent negative evaluations would be published alongside positive ones. A one-page methodology brief that maps your work to proof-pack schema fields — with gaps flagged honestly — is attached. With respect, Rob Stillwell Director, Trellison Institute
← Nature-Based MRV · Carbon capture portfolio · Partnership modes
Feedback from visitors, translated into business terminology and listed below. Use the assistant in the corner to add a comment.